Physiotherapists' Evidence-Based Practice profiles by HS-EBP questionnaire in Spain: A cross-sectional normative study.

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is a cost-effective approach for improving the quality of clinical care and implementing only well-tested evidence. Health professions, especially physiotherapy, must embrace EBP principles. This paper presents normative data from the Spanish physiotherapist population using the Health-Sciences Evidence-Based Practice questionnaire and explores EBP clusters/profiles of professionals in practice. An intentional sample of 419 practicing physiotherapists was recruited from the Spanish Professional Council of Physiotherapy. Participants completed a cross-sectional online survey with 60 Likert items (scale 1-10) measuring 5 dimensions: 1) Beliefs and attitudes, 2) Results from literature, 3) Professional practice, 4) Assessment of results, and 5) Barriers and Facilitators. The protocol also included sociodemographic, training, and practice-related contrast variables. Normative data were estimated and tabulated for each dimension and then a K-means clustering procedure was implemented using the contrast variables. Results for normative data showed, in descending order, the following 50th percentile values for the five EBP factors: Beliefs and attitudes (8.25), Professional practice (8.00), Assessment of results (7.42), Results from literature (6.71), and EBP Barriers and Facilitators (5.17); all expressed on a scale of 1 to 10. Academic degree, EBP training level, and work time shared in healthcare activity, research, or teaching activity were all statistically significant for discriminating EBP dimension scores. Finally, six different clusters showed that when EBP level is low, the scores in all dimensions are equally low, and vice-versa. The EBP dimensions "Beliefs and attitudes", "Professional practice", and "Evaluation of results" obtained better normative scores overall than "Search for bibliographic evidence and its inclusion in practice" and especially "Perception of EBP barriers", which had the worst score. Normative data are useful for comparing individual scores and the reference population, and information about clusters will enable appropriate global EBP intervention programs to be designed and implemented.

[Satisfaction of Users with Spinal Cord Injury in relation to the Service of Promotion of Personal Autonomy of the Balearic Islands, Spain]. / Satisfacción de las personas con lesión medular con el Servicio de Promoción de la Autonomía Personal en las Islas Baleares.

BACKGROUND: Public Service Promotion of Personal Autonomy aims to provide care to users with severe physical and/or physical-mental disabilities, including people with spinal cord injury. These users are in a chronic phase and thus they require educational-therapeutic measures of physiotherapy. This study is meant to determine the satisfaction of people with spinal cord injury who attend this service. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional, quantitative study in the Public Service Promotion of Personal Autonomy after a sixteen-month therapeutic monitoring process was carried out, which began in March 2015. The final study sample was 25 people with spinal cord injury (17 men and 8 women). At the end of therapeutic intervention, users responded to the SERVQHOS questionnaire, which consists in nineteen questions that aim to measure the quality of the care services provided. A statistical analysis was conducted, calculating averages and standard deviations or frecuencies and percentages. RESULTS: The best valued external factor was the staff appearance with 4,5 on average and the worst scored external factor was the ease of access and / or signposting of the center with 2,6 on average. On the other hand, the best valued internal factor was the kindness of the staff with 4,8 on average and the worst scored factor was the speed in which the users receive what they requested with 4,2 on average. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the quality offered is determined by internal factors (kindness, trust, willingness to help) and weaknesses are related to structural factors of the center (external factors).

Consenso sobre competencias para la enfermería de práctica avanzada en España / Consensus on competencies for advanced nursing practice in Spain

INTRODUCCIÓN: Existe falta de consenso internacional sobre la definición exacta y las competencias asociadas a los roles de enfermería de práctica avanzada (EPA), caso que resulta más acuciante en nuestro entorno nacional dada la corta trayectoria de la misma en nuestro país. El objetivo del trabajo consistió en delinear el marco competencial para enfermeras de práctica avanzada en nuestro contexto nacional mediante el proceso de consenso de expertos a través del método Delphi. MÉTODO: Basándonos en un proceso de revisión bibliográfica previo, se identificó un conglomerado de 17 dominios competenciales (clusters de competencias relacionadas). Este conjunto inicial fue revisado, refinado y validado por un conjunto de panelistas expertos en la materia (tanto clínicos como investigadores, gestores y docentes) a través de sucesivas rondas en busca del adecuado consenso sobre cada una de las diferentes competencias propuestas. RESULTADOS: Los resultados permitieron establecer una sólida base en forma de mapa de competencias que permitiera identificar aquellos conjuntos de competencias más específicos para roles de práctica avanzada, independientemente del contexto de regulación y práctica profesional, identificando dominios como investigación y práctica basada en la evidencia, liderazgo clínico y profesional o gestión de cuidados. DISCUSIÓN: Este conjunto de competencias relacionadas con roles de práctica avanzada en nuestro entorno permite delinear los estándares competenciales propios de este nivel de práctica enfermera, y servir de referencia tanto para el desarrollo normativo, la revisión de roles o el planteamiento de perfiles formativos

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of international consensus on the exact definition and core competencies of advanced practice nursing (APN) roles, a problem particularly acute in our national context due to the lack of APN role development, which has a significantly short history in our country. The main objective of this paper was the delineation of the competence framework for Advanced Practice Nurses in our national context based on expert consensus through the Delphi method Method: Based on a preliminary literature review process, a conglomerate of 17 domains of competence (clusters of related competencies) were identified. This initial set was revised, refined and validated by a group of expert panellists on the subject (clinicians, researchers, managers, and teachers) through successive rounds in search of a suitable consensus on each of the various proposed items RESULTS: The results helped to establish a solid foundation in the form of a skills map that could identify those sets of more specific competencies for advanced practice roles, regardless of regulatory and professional practice context, identifying domains such as Research and Evidence Based Practice, Clinical and Professional Leadership, or Care Management DISCUSSION: This set of skills related to advanced practice roles in our environment can delineate competency standards common to this level of nursing practice, and serve as a reference for policy development, a review of roles, or the establishment of academic profiles

[Consensus on competencies for advanced nursing practice in Spain]. / Consenso sobre competencias para la enfermería de práctica avanzada en España.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of international consensus on the exact definition and core competencies of advanced practice nursing (APN) roles, a problem particularly acute in our national context due to the lack of APN role development, which has a significantly short history in our country. The main objective of this paper was the delineation of the competence framework for Advanced Practice Nurses in our national context based on expert consensus through the Delphi method METHOD: Based on a preliminary literature review process, a conglomerate of 17 domains of competence (clusters of related competencies) were identified. This initial set was revised, refined and validated by a group of expert panellists on the subject (clinicians, researchers, managers, and teachers) through successive rounds in search of a suitable consensus on each of the various proposed items RESULTS: The results helped to establish a solid foundation in the form of a skills map that could identify those sets of more specific competencies for advanced practice roles, regardless of regulatory and professional practice context, identifying domains such as Research and Evidence Based Practice, Clinical and Professional Leadership, or Care Management DISCUSSION: This set of skills related to advanced practice roles in our environment can delineate competency standards common to this level of nursing practice, and serve as a reference for policy development, a review of roles, or the establishment of academic profiles.

Impact of the politics of austerity in the quality of healthcare: ethical advice.

This article aims to provide a series of reflections before implementing a restructuring of health system management and cutbacks in health due to the possible consequences this may have on citizens' health. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that public healthcare shall be extended to the whole population in conditions of effective equality and overcoming geographical and social imbalances, based on a comprehensive approach to the healthcare system. All of this--while we are aware of the current situation of economic crisis--should be taken into account before carrying out adjustments that will harm the health of citizens and options or alternatives that will not affect equity and healthcare should be weighed up. In conclusion, management models that enable the empowerment of nursing are more justified than ever before, because it is nurses who mostly defend positions of patient advocacy towards attitudes of greater commitment and participation.

[Smoking among nursing and physical therapy students of the University of the Balearic Islands: opinions on regulation of smoking in public places]. / Hábito tabáquico entre los estudiantes de enfermería y fisioterapia de la Universitat de les Illes Balears: opinión ante la regulación del consumo en lugares públicos.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, opinions and attitudes of nursing and physical therapy students at the University of the Balearic Islands toward smoking in public places and the influence of regulatory policies. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional, descriptive, observational study using a self-administered questionnaire. The survey was designed to evaluate opinions on and the degree of agreement with smoking and regulatory policies on this issue. The assessment was performed using Likert scales. The survey was offered to all students attending class in the core subject with the greatest number of enrolled students on a normal academic day between February 15 and March 15, 2006. We calculated 95% confidence intervals for proportions. The Chi square test was used to compare qualitative variables and Student's t-test was used for quantitative variables. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 345 students, 82.2% of whom were women. The mean age was 21.9 years. The prevalence of regular smokers was 26.1% (26.9% among women and 22.6% among men). Almost all (93.8%) of the respondents agreed that smoking should be banned in closed spaces in educational institutions and 70.9% believed that the law should be complied with at the University of the Balearic Islands, with differences between 2003 and 2006. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking was less prevalent in our population than in the general regional and national populations, as well as in other Spanish nursing students of the same age and gender. The prevalence of occasional smokers has fallen since 2003. Most students had a favorable view of the new Smoking Prevention Act.

[What perspective do intensive care nurses have of their relationship with the relatives of a critical patient?]. / ¿Qué perspectiva tienen las enfermeras de unidades de cuidados intensivos de su relación con los familiares del paciente crítico?

Introduction and aim. Nursing professionals in intensive care units (ICU) face situations of uncertainty and anxiety, above all in patients' relatives. In the literature, we find that the way in which the family and their needs are valued by professionals in the unit is not very systematical, even though there are instruments that have been validated for this purpose. Therefore, we decided to value what perspective ICU nurses have of the relationship they establish with patients' relatives, in order to find possible explanations for this situation. Material and methods. A qualitative study with a critical-social orientation. This was carred out in three ICUs in three state hospitals in Mallorca. Research techniques: 8 observations of the visit of relatives to the unit and 6 semi-structured interviews with nurses from the three hospitals. The transcripts of the interviews were analysed and codified in significance units. Sources and methods were triangulated.Results. Categories of the relationship process: 1) who the social actors are; 2) what the actions of the nurses with respect to the relatives are; 3) what the relationships are like between both; and 4) expectations of the nurses regarding this relationship.Conclusions. a) It is necessary to establish quality standards for attending the relatives of critical patients. b) Continuous nursing training is necessary in order to provide emotional support to families and to protect nurses from the added stress involved in providing this emotional support.